full

Episode 421 - TikTok

Topics:

00:00 Welcome to the Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove Podcast

00:42 Introducing the Team and Today's Hot Topics

04:31 Local Government Elections: A Personal Insight

07:23 Gratitude Segment: What We're Thankful For

09:10 The Big Ideas for a Better Australia Conference

10:30 Long COVID: Unpacking the Facts and Myths

17:47 Gina Reinhart's Government Handouts Controversy

24:34 Australia's GST Distribution Debate

28:26 Generational Ideological Divides: A Closer Look

3:43 Australia's Role in Global Affairs: Public Opinion

37:39 The Pharmacy Guild and Prescription Changes

38:25 Economist's Critique on the State of Economics

39:30 Unveiling the Power Dynamics in Economics

41:17 The Controversial Life of Angus Deaton

41:39 Economics: A Dark Art or a Science?

42:17 The Global Impact of Corporate Giants

42:55 Protectionism vs. Free Trade: A Global Debate

55:11 The TikTok Controversy: Data Privacy and National

Security

01:00:18 Deciphering the Myths and Facts About TikTok

01:12:34 The Global Perspective on Social Media and Data

Privacy

01:23:44 Reflecting on the

Podcast and Upcoming Topics

To financially support the Podcast you can make:

We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.

You can sign up for our newsletter, which links to articles that Trevor has highlighted as potentially interesting and that may be discussed on the podcast. You will get 3 emails per week. After the fiasco mentioned in episode 454 I can't use Mailchimp anymore so for the moment, send me an email and I'll add you to a temporary list until something more automated is arranged.

We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can send us a voicemail message at Speakpipe

Transcripts started in episode 324. You can use this link to search our transcripts. Type "iron fist velvet glove" into the search directory, click on our podcast and then do a word search. It even has a player which will play the relevant section. It is incredibly quick.

Transcript
Trevor:

Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over

Trevor:

time, evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of homosapiens.

Trevor:

But today, we observe a small tribe akin to a group of meerkats that

Trevor:

gather together atop a small mound to watch, question, and discuss the

Trevor:

current events of their city, their country, and their world at large.

Trevor:

Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the

Trevor:

Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove.

Trevor:

Yes, hello and welcome dear listener.

Trevor:

Episode 421 of this little podcast.

Trevor:

As we sit on, oh, we stand up on a mound, look around as meerkats and

Trevor:

Check out what's going on in the world.

Trevor:

I'm Trevor, aka The Iron Fist with us nearly as always.

Trevor:

The Velvet Glove, Scott, you're with us this

Scott:

week.

Scott:

I'm here with you, Trevor.

Scott:

Yes, I do apologize for last week.

Scott:

I completely slipped my mind.

Trevor:

No problem whatsoever.

Trevor:

And Joe, the tech guy.

Trevor:

How are you, Joe?

Trevor:

Good.

Trevor:

Very good.

Trevor:

If you're in the chat room, say hello, Watley's already there,

Trevor:

redheaded Watley, as we now know.

Trevor:

yeah.

Trevor:

So what's on the agenda?

Trevor:

We're going to talk a little bit about Australian news.

Trevor:

So a bit about long COVID, what the sort of chief medical officer

Trevor:

from Queensland had to say.

Trevor:

Gina Reinhart getting some free money from the government, GST carve

Trevor:

up, ideological gender differences, a little bit on essential pole.

Trevor:

A little bit about the Pharmacy Guild, a bit about economics and

Trevor:

economists sort of acknowledging they don't know what they're doing.

Trevor:

And then I really want to have a good chat about TikTok and the proposed ban in the

Trevor:

United States and what is that all about.

Trevor:

You guys been following that one at all independently or not really?

Scott:

I did hear about podcast the other day that I was listening to and I just

Scott:

think to myself, I don't understand, I don't, I don't use TikTok or anything like

Scott:

that so I couldn't tell you what the beat up's about but it's one of those things

Scott:

I just think to myself that the Yanks are actually Looking at something they're

Scott:

saying the Chinese own this, therefore the Chinese are out here polluting our

Scott:

political system, so I would have thought that given that Russia has already

Scott:

influenced the American elections using Facebook and everything else, that that

Scott:

would be enough for, that would be enough for them to say, okay, this is just a

Scott:

new little threat that we've got to deal with on our, on our horizon, rather than

Scott:

actually going, you know, banning it.

Scott:

And then it was even more ridiculous.

Scott:

Like when that, when the head of TikTok was in America and that sort

Scott:

of stuff, he appeared before the U.

Scott:

S.

Scott:

Senate and they said, oh, you're a member of the Chinese Communist Party.

Scott:

He says, I'm Singaporean.

Scott:

Yes.

Scott:

And he said, well, have you ever fought with a PLA?

Scott:

He says, I'm Singaporean.

Scott:

You know, they just wouldn't get it through their thick skulls

Scott:

that just because he's yellow doesn't mean that he's Chinese.

Trevor:

You know, they

Scott:

are so bloody blinking over there, aren't they?

Trevor:

Did you think to yourself, maybe this whole security threat is a complete

Trevor:

beat up, and there is no security threat?

Scott:

Absolutely I did, because I thought to myself that, you know,

Scott:

TikTok is something that I think that they limit how long you can

Scott:

actually say a video for, do you?

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Yeah,

Joe:

so the rule short, it's basically death by attention span.

Trevor:

Yes, it's got an excellent algorithm that's got people sucked in.

Trevor:

Cooked for hours at a time.

Trevor:

Yes, I've never used it but that's my understanding.

Trevor:

It should,

Joe:

it should be banned just because it's so awful,

Trevor:

not because of it won't exist.

Trevor:

Yeah, well we're going to get into TikTok and examine what

Trevor:

exactly is going on there.

Trevor:

So you dear listener, the next time you're at a dinner party, And the topic

Trevor:

of the TikTok band comes up, you will be the most informed person in the room

Trevor:

by being an IFVG listener, which I guess you'll just be quite used to that status.

Trevor:

I like to think our listeners are the know it alls when they're at these

Trevor:

social events and, you wouldn't have thought so, yeah, hopefully they

Trevor:

aren't, so anyway, that's on the agenda.

Trevor:

Maybe we'll talk about Gaza and what's going on there at the same time.

Trevor:

sorry.

Trevor:

gentlemen, did you vote in the, in the local government election?

Trevor:

Yes,

Scott:

I did.

Scott:

And I helped count the votes on Saturday night.

Scott:

I'm going back for the next three days to also count.

Scott:

I'm going down to We've got a complicated system up here.

Scott:

We don't have divisions or anything like that.

Scott:

They're all just Councillors that are elected for the whole

Scott:

area and you've got 10 of them.

Scott:

So what you've got to do is you've got to, you've got to

Scott:

choose 10 on your ballot paper.

Scott:

And there were 29 that were running.

Scott:

So you choose 10.

Scott:

So what you do is you go through and you've got to actually do

Scott:

this bloody complicated voting counting and all that sort of stuff.

Scott:

When you.

Scott:

They attach them to a clipboard so that they are all on exactly the same side,

Scott:

same runs and that sort of stuff, and then you run a ruler down, you count

Scott:

the first lot, and you say, well, they haven't got any votes, the next lot's

Scott:

got two votes, and then you go down, they've got three votes, and they've got

Scott:

five and everything else, you get down until you do that across, 60 or 80, 000

Trevor:

people.

Trevor:

Wow.

Trevor:

And were you there just as a volunteer?

Trevor:

Well, you were doing part time work sort of thing.

Trevor:

I was getting paid for it.

Trevor:

Yep.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Sounds complicated.

Trevor:

I tried to.

Scott:

Well, I was, I was only just, I was just sorting them out into informal

Scott:

and informal votes and that sort of stuff.

Scott:

Then we had to put rubber bands around them in Baxter's 50.

Scott:

So that's just getting ready for, ready for this complicated

Scott:

count process, which is.

Scott:

Already started, but they rang me up this afternoon and said, can

Scott:

I work for the next three days?

Scott:

I said,

Trevor:

yes, I can.

Trevor:

Yeah, that's good.

Trevor:

Well, by the way, dear listener, if you don't want to listen to our

Trevor:

chit chat about our lives, then look at the chapters and fast forward

Trevor:

to the meaty bits, but we'll just continue with a little chit chat here.

Trevor:

exactly.

Trevor:

Cause you know, I would

Scott:

have thought that our, I would have thought that our listeners would

Scott:

love us enough to actually want to know what's happening in our personal

Trevor:

lives.

Trevor:

You just never know.

Trevor:

I tried, I tried to vote down the Gold Coast.

Trevor:

Yeah,

Scott:

and you can't because you're outside of your

Trevor:

local area.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

I didn't, I didn't know that for local council elections, that you

Trevor:

couldn't, I'm so used to doing it for state and federal, just vote anywhere.

Trevor:

Walked in and they said, there's a piece of paper over there, just

Trevor:

write down your name and address and why you couldn't vote, because, and

Trevor:

yeah, in this day and age, didn't have the technology to allow somebody

Trevor:

from Brisbane to vote in the council election if they're in the Gold Coast.

Trevor:

I thought that was Yeah, I know.

Scott:

I thought it was a little bit ridiculous too.

Scott:

I got done with that in Rockhampton when I got, I was living there

Scott:

the first time and everything else when there was a council election.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

Hmm.

Scott:

And I went down and I said, look, I haven't changed my

Scott:

voting, voting address yet.

Scott:

I'm still registered in Brisbane.

Scott:

They said, well, you can't vote.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

It just didn't have the paperwork for it.

Trevor:

Exactly.

Trevor:

All right.

Trevor:

what are we grateful for?

Trevor:

I'm grateful for Squash TV, dear listener.

Trevor:

Squash TV?

Trevor:

Yes, I play a lot of squash.

Trevor:

It keeps me, it's a fantastic sport.

Trevor:

If you're looking for a sport that takes your mind off things, keeps you

Trevor:

fit and just the greatest game of all.

Trevor:

when I, well I signed up to a Squash TV subscription maybe four or five years

Trevor:

ago and I'm totally addicted to it.

Trevor:

I don't watch any football or any cricket or any regular.

Trevor:

Sport and all on TV, but I watch a lot of squash TV.

Trevor:

So that's what I'm grateful for.

Trevor:

You guys grateful for anything?

Scott:

Well, I'm grateful for my four of my one, two, three, four, five

Scott:

subscription television channels that I've got so No, I'm also I am also

Scott:

grateful that I am Progressing in my, application for a financial controller's

Scott:

job up here, which would be really good if

Trevor:

I get that, so anyway.

Trevor:

Excellent.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Joe, anything?

Trevor:

Just an ungrateful bastard.

Joe:

I'm gonna say, Apple Photos.

Trevor:

Apple Photos?

Trevor:

Yeah,

Joe:

I scanned a thousand photos Mum's place, or rather

Joe:

I had them scanned for me.

Joe:

And I am slowly going through, cropping them, and, Setting the black and

Joe:

white color balance and removing all the finger marks, stains and various

Joe:

detritus and trying to get some semblance of them so that at least

Joe:

they're archived and I've got some notes of them, before mum is no longer

Joe:

around to tell me who these people are.

Trevor:

So Apple Photos is just a, is just, Is that just the photos that's

Trevor:

on your phone, Apple Photos, is it?

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Right, okay.

Trevor:

And it's also

Joe:

on my laptop.

Trevor:

Very good.

Trevor:

Right, okay.

Trevor:

Well, the other thing I'm grateful for is I didn't have to go to the triple

Trevor:

conference, Joe, that you told me about.

Trevor:

So, dear listener, there was a conference down in Albury called

Trevor:

Big Ideas for a Better Australia.

Trevor:

Joe sent it to me and said I should check it out.

Trevor:

And, I could have joined hundreds of like minded locals, hundreds more from around

Trevor:

Australia, as they brought together the best minds and best speakers, as offering

Trevor:

the best ideas for a better Australia.

Trevor:

And they had three conferences over three days.

Trevor:

And, on the Friday it was Freedman Friday.

Trevor:

What is freedom?

Trevor:

Why is it being eroded and how do we get it back?

Trevor:

Australia's premier libertarian conference.

Trevor:

That was on the Friday.

Trevor:

On the Saturday we had Church and State Saturday.

Trevor:

We cannot serve two masters.

Trevor:

What should believers do when the government claims to be God?

Trevor:

And then, finishing off on Sunday was Net Zero Gala Dinner.

Trevor:

Say no to Net Zero at the gala launch of this funny but serious campaign.

Trevor:

How will you say, net?

Trevor:

I think they got, about between 50 and 100 people, mostly over 70, Joe.

Trevor:

And, I don't think it was much of a success, that conference, but Thanks

Trevor:

for the Yes, thanks for the link.

Trevor:

Glad I didn't have to go.

Trevor:

Long COVID.

Trevor:

Article came out, or news reports came out, about the Queensland Chief

Trevor:

Health Officer asked for the term Long COVID to be scrapped as new research

Trevor:

suggests that it's no more sinister than the long term effects of the flu.

Trevor:

So apparently Queensland Health did research of 5, 000 Australians

Trevor:

and found the lasting effects of infection from seasonal flu

Trevor:

and other respiratory illnesses.

Trevor:

It was about the same for people infected with COVID.

Trevor:

And he says, just using that term, Long COVID caused unnecessary fear.

Trevor:

Was that surprising to you guys that he would come out and say that?

Trevor:

No, I

Joe:

mean, we've known for a couple of years that Long COVID is probably

Joe:

a post viral syndrome the same as lots of others like ME, CFS, Fibromyalgia,

Joe:

there's a whole load of basket case diagnoses that are almost certainly.

Joe:

The immune system overreacting to a viral infection.

Joe:

Hmm.

Joe:

The advantage of long COVID is, one, it's catchy, it's got people's attention,

Joe:

and two, the fact that there are so many cases of it, it's now getting

Joe:

focus on post viral syndrome as a whole.

Joe:

So I think we need to be recognizing that It's not a standalone disease.

Joe:

It's, it's something that's around that has just gone unnoticed and uncared about.

Joe:

And hopefully we'll get a

Trevor:

lot

Joe:

more research because more people are affected by this.

Trevor:

If you just read the headline and the first few paragraphs, you

Trevor:

would get the impression, Oh, they're saying on COVID isn't a thing.

Trevor:

But when you read into it, what they're saying is, Long covid is a thing, but

Trevor:

it's the same as, other respiratory viruses and illnesses and that it

Trevor:

does exist and it's just exists with things that are not covid as well.

Trevor:

So over 16% of respondents reported ongoing symptoms a year later,

Trevor:

and 3.6% reported moderate to severe functional impairment.

Trevor:

So he's saying that is a thing, it just happens with other virus

Trevor:

respiratory illnesses as well.

Trevor:

And, and the other thing that came up in that was that, perhaps Australia

Trevor:

overall had low rates of long COVID because we were mostly vaccinated and

Trevor:

were then exposed to the Omicron variant, which seemed to have less, long COVID.

Trevor:

side effects than the earlier COVID 19 variants.

Trevor:

So that might mean that Queensland and Australia is different too.

Trevor:

Other countries who had the earlier versions that had more

Trevor:

evidence of long COVID, perhaps.

Trevor:

I think that's probably

Scott:

right, because, you know, I first heard about long COVID

Scott:

when I was listening to the Dr.

Scott:

Norman Schwarzkopf.

Scott:

I can't even

Trevor:

remember what he's Yeah, I know the guy you mean, yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah,

Scott:

Dr.

Scott:

Norman, no, Dr.

Scott:

Norman Swan.

Scott:

I was thinking Norman Schwarzkopf, that was the general that, kicked Saddam's ass.

Scott:

Anyway, anyway, And I just heard long COVID then, and that scared

Scott:

the living shit out of me.

Scott:

It did scare me, so I can actually understand where they're

Scott:

saying that it leads to alarm.

Scott:

It certainly led to the alarm on mine, you know, because I thought to

Scott:

myself, if I get this, I'm going to end up with long COVID for months.

Scott:

But it turned out, you know, I got it.

Scott:

It was over it in two days.

Scott:

And then it was only until the next Saturday that I started getting it.

Scott:

I started testing negative so then I could go outside again.

Trevor:

No doubt though, you'll run into people, dear listener, who'll say, Oh,

Trevor:

health guy said long COVID's not a thing.

Trevor:

And that's not what he said.

Trevor:

Not the case, yes.

Trevor:

Just got to read these things.

Trevor:

There's nuance in there.

Trevor:

And there's a few interplaying ideas and concepts that you

Trevor:

have to get to grip with.

Trevor:

So,

Joe:

I remember arguing about the seasonal vaccine.

Joe:

people saying, Oh, you know, I always get flu from it, which is a load of rubbish.

Joe:

but also, Oh, you know, flu is not that bad.

Joe:

It's like, if you've never had flu, you'll think it's not that bad.

Joe:

If you've ever, if you've ever really had flu, I was as a 20 year old in

Joe:

bed for three weeks, unable to move.

Joe:

and it doesn't surprise me that yeah, 16 percent of people who've had real

Joe:

flu are left with long term effects.

Joe:

and I think that, that needs to be the takeaway, not that long COVID

Joe:

doesn't exist, that all of these diseases can cause long term effects

Joe:

in a subset of the population, and we need to be doing more to help them.

Trevor:

Hmm.

Trevor:

Yeah, there's just a classic example where the story isn't straightforward.

Trevor:

It requires the interplay of a few different facts to get to the real issue.

Trevor:

And I was just looking on some of my friend's Facebook page the other day

Trevor:

where there was Anti climate change people commenting and it just struck me

Trevor:

that they just were incapable of holding several concepts and ideas and interplays

Trevor:

together, you know, what, how come we've got so much snow in winter and, and,

Trevor:

other things we're, we're, we're, we're Okay, it's because the extra moisture in

Trevor:

the air and the polar vortex is breaking down because of climate change and just

Trevor:

a whole bunch of, of things where people just need to know a number of different

Trevor:

ideas and how they interact with each other in order to get to the truth.

Trevor:

Things aren't always just simple.

Trevor:

Straightforward answers, and I think people really crave for that.

Trevor:

They want the simple, straightforward answer.

Trevor:

There's,

Joe:

so, Earth has an incredibly moderate temperature range

Joe:

between the poles and the equator.

Joe:

Because there's something, there's basically a water flow

Joe:

around that moves warm water from the equator up to the poles.

Joe:

and there is a fear that if the polar ice caps melt, that

Joe:

water flow will cease to exist.

Joe:

And that we will get very, very cold winters, certainly in Northern Europe,

Joe:

because Northern Europe is much warmer than the equivalent latitude in, in the U.

Joe:

S.

Joe:

East Coast U.

Joe:

S.

Joe:

Basically, the U.

Joe:

K.

Joe:

is about the same latitude as, Newfoundland.

Joe:

So you'd expect a similar climate there.

Joe:

and, yes, if you get global warming, it melts the ice caps, which interferes

Joe:

with the salinity of the sea.

Joe:

Which stops this movement of seawater around, which stops the, the Gulf

Trevor:

Stream happening.

Trevor:

Hmm.

Trevor:

but yes, it's, it's a fairly And the deniers just wanted to throw

Trevor:

up their hands and say, well, that's all far too complicated.

Trevor:

You're making things up.

Trevor:

It can't be true.

Trevor:

Well, exactly.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

It's, it's frustrating that people look for the simple answers and aren't prepared

Trevor:

to put in the work just a little bit to try and understand how things go.

Trevor:

So anyway, Gina Reinhart.

Trevor:

She has interests in Liontown Resources and Arafura Rare Earths, and the

Trevor:

government has given Liontown Resources 230 million in government agency loans,

Trevor:

and Australian Rare Earths received 840 million in loans and straight

Trevor:

handouts to develop a lithium mine.

Trevor:

But she's going

Joe:

to hand it back because she's

Trevor:

a believer in small government.

Trevor:

That's right.

Trevor:

This is the woman who says government should get out of people's lives.

Trevor:

Except when it's an 840 million handout to her mine.

Trevor:

Why are we not, after all of our experience, saying, Yeah, okay,

Trevor:

developing a lithium mine's a great idea.

Trevor:

Here's our 840 million, how many shares do we get in the company for that?

Trevor:

Rather than these loans.

Trevor:

It's just a repetition of

Scott:

And then, you know, and then if, if that 840 million

Scott:

down the track turns out to be 1.

Scott:

6 billion, then we can sell it.

Scott:

Then we can sell those shares to the private markets.

Scott:

And then they end up with flooding with money back into our coffers.

Scott:

It's very frustrating that, you know, everyone, I know socialism got

Scott:

a bad rap over many years because the government was, you know,

Scott:

Too involved in the economy, but

Trevor:

it's

Scott:

not as evil as that would make out because that 840 million

Scott:

dollars could end up being 1.

Scott:

6 billion dollars in a relatively short period of time.

Scott:

However, with the rare earths and all that sort of stuff, you

Scott:

know, what was the latest miner that's gone belly up over lithium?

Scott:

Anyway,

Trevor:

yeah.

Trevor:

Not sure.

Joe:

the big thing with, capitalism is, externalities.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

so you don't factor in the true cost to the society as a whole, you're only,

Joe:

the business, it only costs, it counts in its immediate costs, and the clean

Joe:

up and all the rest of that is left for other people to pick up the bill.

Joe:

Exactly, which is ridiculous.

Joe:

A decent system of capitalism would factor in externalities as well.

Trevor:

Well, dear listener, Mariana Mazzucato wrote a book which detailed

Trevor:

the inventions made by various U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

government agencies and how that technology was then used by Apple and

Trevor:

other groups and really other sort of loans that were given to people like

Trevor:

Elon Musk and others, where really the government should have taken

Trevor:

an equity stake in what they were providing because it was risky, sort

Trevor:

of loans that they were given and they could have got it, but they didn't.

Trevor:

They just got, loans that were, they made loans which were quickly repaid and the

Trevor:

entrepreneurs made billions as a result.

Trevor:

This is

Joe:

also true of, science as a whole.

Joe:

So the vast majority of science is government funded, but all the

Joe:

papers that are written are published and owned by private journals.

Joe:

And so, although the government has funded the science that is leading to

Joe:

these articles, you can't access the articles that your taxes are paid for.

Trevor:

We did a section on that 300 episodes ago, I reckon it was.

Trevor:

I'm sure.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah, anyway, that was, Gina Reinhardt, a beneficiary of

Trevor:

Largesse from the government.

Trevor:

and of course, in the lead up to the next election, she will fund as many

Trevor:

people as she can to get rid of Labor.

Trevor:

So why would they agree to it in the first place?

Trevor:

She's not going to be a friend as a result.

Trevor:

Nah,

Scott:

she's, I've got a very low opinion of Mrs.

Trevor:

Reinhardt.

Trevor:

But it's, it's

Joe:

all right.

Joe:

Mr Potato Head flew across to WA for her birthday?

Trevor:

Yes, indeed, yes.

Trevor:

Didn't he pay

Scott:

for that

Joe:

or was that paid for by her?

Joe:

Allegedly, he paid for it.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

Okay.

Joe:

Certainly he claims the taxpayer didn't, although I think the taxpayer

Joe:

had to pay for his security detail.

Trevor:

In the chat room, John says, I know a science YouTube

Trevor:

blogger that has been bedridden with long COVID for two years now.

Trevor:

Watley says Al Gore was saying that about the Gulf Stream in 1996.

Trevor:

Liam says, that's a spirit, Comrade Scott, I

Scott:

am not a socialist, alright?

Scott:

I, have some sympathy for it, though, but I am not a card carrying socialist.

Trevor:

And Motley says, Largesse is a good word for Gina Reinhardt.

Trevor:

Right, did I miss any from earlier?

Trevor:

Wotley's grateful for Pewter and Liam's grateful that Scott is a Greens voter.

Trevor:

Oh, there we go.

Trevor:

Hey, I've

Scott:

got a bone to pick with you, Liam.

Scott:

I will give you, I'll give Trevor permission to give you my phone

Scott:

number so I can have a go at you over the, Greens Lord Mayoral

Scott:

candidate down there in Brisbane.

Trevor:

What do you, what do you, what do you mean you want

Trevor:

to have a go at what, what was Sreenath, or whatever your name is?

Scott:

I can't remember what her name was.

Scott:

I just thought it was ridiculous how she actually attended that protest,

Scott:

over that woman that was being kicked out of her house, when they didn't

Scott:

actually look into it to find out that the woman owed, You know, a hundred days

Scott:

worth of rent or something like that.

Scott:

This is despite the fact that the tenant, that the tenant was being charged below

Scott:

market rate for rent and everything else.

Scott:

And the guy wanted to sell the place so that he could fund his 102 year

Scott:

old mother to go into a nursing home.

Scott:

And the Greens said, Oh, this, yeah, that sounds like the

Scott:

hill we're going to die on.

Trevor:

Yes, but property is theft, Scott.

Trevor:

Sorry.

Scott:

It's not theft because what they wanted to do, they were going to

Scott:

sell that Salisbury place to someone else that thinks to himself, Oh yeah,

Scott:

this is a thousand square metres, banging guys with their bulldozers

Scott:

and up goes a six or seven pack of

Trevor:

units.

Trevor:

Are you expecting perfection, Scott?

Scott:

Oh, I am.

Scott:

Because these people do hold themselves up as perfection and they are not.

Trevor:

Liam, in the chat, give us your response to that tirade.

Trevor:

We'll get that going as we keep talking.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

I can't see the chat right now.

Trevor:

Why can't you see the chat?

Trevor:

I don't know.

Trevor:

I don't know.

Trevor:

Any reason why?

Trevor:

Oh, it's not on the screen.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

It wasn't turned on.

Trevor:

I don't know why.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Forgot all about that.

Trevor:

There we go.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

But.

Trevor:

There we go, there's the chat.

Trevor:

Nobody told us about that, so.

Trevor:

Okay, now you can see it, Scott.

Trevor:

Thank you.

Trevor:

Yep, sorry about that.

Trevor:

Don't apologise, it's fine.

Trevor:

GST carve up, so it's come out about what each state is going to get, and Queensland

Trevor:

and New South Wales are complaining about the amount that they're getting.

Trevor:

You remember we did a story about Saul Eslake describing how Western

Trevor:

Australia cut a GST deal that, in his words, is the worst Australian public

Trevor:

policy decision of the 21st century.

Trevor:

Meaning it's worse than Orcus Submarines.

Trevor:

So that's saying something.

Trevor:

And anyway, Queensland, NSW complaining about how much they got.

Trevor:

Deputy Opposition Leader Jared Blayge says Queensland had been dutted

Trevor:

by the Federal Labor Government.

Trevor:

Why is Stephen Miles not screaming from the rooftop, like I've seen him do before,

Trevor:

when it was a Coalition Government?

Trevor:

It's because the formulas are all set previously,

Scott:

One of those things, I think they've actually got to sit down and work

Scott:

out some kind of formula that would keep them basically happy because, you know

Trevor:

The formula gets bastardized

Scott:

because of political interest.

Scott:

Bastardized by political interest, which is where it goes wrong.

Scott:

But, you know, I can understand why New South Wales feels aggrieved because they

Scott:

have never, they've never got one for one of the GST back that they put into it.

Scott:

I can understand that.

Scott:

However Tasmania would be an absolute basket case if you gave them only

Scott:

back what they had achieved for GST.

Scott:

You know?

Scott:

It's

Trevor:

We just want a fair and equitable system where those who are

Trevor:

doing well subsidise those who aren't.

Trevor:

And

Scott:

And then you've got that situation that WA was had to, you

Scott:

know, because of their mining boom and everything else, they had a hell of a

Scott:

lot of money go into their royalties.

Scott:

So that, that affected their, that affected their GST carve up, which

Scott:

is why Costella, not Costella, who was it, Morrison got involved

Scott:

and said, no, we can't do that.

Scott:

So

Trevor:

I think basically Western Australia almost got to the point where

Trevor:

it was getting 12 cents for every dollar of GST that it actually collected.

Trevor:

And then Morrison chipped in to say, well, we'll have a new rule that a

Trevor:

state must receive at least 70 cents, for every, dollar that it provides.

Trevor:

And, and then to keep the other states happy, there was a no state will

Trevor:

be worse off provision put into it.

Trevor:

And initially that was estimated to cost X billions of dollars.

Trevor:

And of course that's just blown out fivefold and it's now.

Trevor:

It's going to cost the budget a huge amount in terms of sending the

Trevor:

states more money than they actually collect because of that provision.

Trevor:

So I'm not exactly sure what happened in this particular case.

Trevor:

It seemed like Queensland and New South Wales had done

Trevor:

really well out of royalties.

Trevor:

And Victoria hadn't.

Trevor:

In any event, it's all very political, the formula, and shitfights to

Trevor:

continue down the track, as always.

Trevor:

I

Joe:

think they said Victoria had shut down a bunch of columns.

Trevor:

okay, so that's why their royalties depleted.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

That's why they needed particular assistance.

Trevor:

There you go.

Trevor:

Now, right, Joe, you sent me this one from the Financial Times.

Trevor:

Maybe Victoria's Sorry?

Scott:

Sorry, why'd Victoria shut down their column once?

Scott:

Was it Brown Call, though?

Trevor:

I

Joe:

think it's the aging power stations and the shutting

Trevor:

down.

Trevor:

Gotcha.

Trevor:

No worries.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Alright.

Trevor:

Liam says, he's not perfect, but no one is, and maybe he got that wrong.

Trevor:

I've no idea.

Trevor:

There we go.

Scott:

So Liam's not going to face me over the phone, huh?

Scott:

Well,

Trevor:

what's there to say?

Trevor:

Do you want to say any more than what you've just said?

Scott:

No, I don't think so.

Scott:

That's fine.

Trevor:

Saved everyone a phone call.

Trevor:

Ideological differences.

Trevor:

This one came from Joe from the article in the Financial Times, so how should

Trevor:

we make sense of reports that Gen Z is hyper progressive on certain issues,

Trevor:

but surprisingly conservative on others?

Trevor:

And I think Gen Z is supposed to be the under 30s.

Trevor:

The answer, in the words of Alice Evans from Stanford University, is

Trevor:

that Today's under 30s are undergoing a great gender divergence, with young

Trevor:

women, in the progressive camp and young men in the conservative camp.

Trevor:

So Gen Z is two generations, not one.

Trevor:

And she says this happens in countries on every continent,

Trevor:

that there's this ideological gap between young men and women.

Trevor:

In the U.

Trevor:

S., Gallup data shows women aged 18 to 30 are now 30 percent younger than men.

Trevor:

Or 30 percentage points more liberal than their male contemporaries,

Trevor:

and that this gap has really opened up in the last six years.

Trevor:

Germany shows a 30 point gap, UK 25 points, Poland, almost half the men

Trevor:

aged 18 to 21 back to the hard right confederation party, compared to just

Trevor:

a sixth of young women of the same age.

Trevor:

there's a graph, and outside the West there's even more stark divisions, South

Trevor:

Korea, similar to the case in China.

Trevor:

So, in the US, UK and Germany, young women now take far more

Trevor:

liberal positions on immigration and racial justice than young men.

Trevor:

There we go.

Trevor:

Any surprises there, gentlemen?

Trevor:

No, not at all.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

Liam, are you our representative?

Trevor:

Well, you're not under 30, are you, Liam?

Trevor:

You're a bit older than that.

Trevor:

You might know some under 30s.

Trevor:

Do you find that the male Gen Z friends are conservative, more

Trevor:

conservative than your female friends.

Trevor:

Let us know, William, or anyone else.

Trevor:

They

Joe:

find that young men more impacted by the social justice causes

Joe:

and are more likely to react to

Trevor:

negative.

Trevor:

Is that because of, what's the word I'm groping for?

Trevor:

The, Jordan

Scott:

Peterson?

Scott:

Well, Jordan Peterson's probably part of it, but what was that

Scott:

guy, what was that, influencer

Trevor:

that, Oh, the guy's been arrested.

Trevor:

Yeah, the guy that's been arrested

Scott:

and is in a car.

Scott:

Oh, Andrew Tate.

Scott:

Andrew Tate, yeah.

Scott:

Is that

Trevor:

because of him?

Trevor:

No, they're all symptoms.

Joe:

So, the push for equality, there's an argument that basically, a lot of

Joe:

young men are feeling disaffected.

Joe:

talked down at, being held up as the reasons, they are

Joe:

guilty of the sins of the past.

Joe:

That sexism in the past, that, the inequality in, number of women

Joe:

in high paying positions has led to men being disproportionately,

Joe:

overlooked for any form of promotion or any form of career advancement.

Joe:

And I think there are a lot of angry young men because of that.

Trevor:

So Yeah, I could see that as a response in some ways.

Trevor:

I

Scott:

could see that as a response, but I don't think it's

Scott:

a particularly fair response.

Trevor:

Maybe

Joe:

not, but I think that's part of it.

Joe:

And a lot of the social justice is you're white, you're male, you're privileged.

Scott:

Yeah, I can, I can agree with that.

Scott:

That is a lot of that is coming across,

Trevor:

you know?

Joe:

And that's why I think it's, it's more men than women that are

Joe:

being picked up by the right wing.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Good thinking, Joe.

Trevor:

Probably right.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

Historically the left, the, yeah, as we've said, the, the left political left

Trevor:

has deserted the working class.

Trevor:

Absolutely.

Trevor:

They have.

Joe:

and I think this is why the right wing are picking up, and the women aren't

Joe:

so thrilled by it, because a lot of it is very much women should be in the kitchen,

Joe:

popping babies out one after the other.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Right, well, I've got a poll from Essential Poll, and looking at

Trevor:

Australia's role in global affairs, so.

Trevor:

Which of the following is closest to your view on what Australia's

Trevor:

role should be in global affairs?

Trevor:

And, first option was, primarily an ally of the US.

Trevor:

The second option was an independent middle power.

Trevor:

Third was the Australia should not engage in world affairs, and

Trevor:

the fourth option was unsure.

Trevor:

And, so, the conservative position would be, I would have thought,

Trevor:

primarily an ally of the US.

Trevor:

And, in terms of age, It's not that much difference.

Trevor:

Well, the 18 34s It's

Scott:

24%, but you know, at 55 plus, you're now at 19%, 5 percent difference.

Trevor:

Yeah, I would have expected a bigger amount of the older people.

Trevor:

Yeah, exactly.

Trevor:

There was a surprising number of younger people to be more willing to

Trevor:

see Australia as an ally of the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

than older people.

Trevor:

That kind of surprised me.

Trevor:

What is

Scott:

very comforting about this is that you've got the, you know, the

Scott:

independent middle power, you know, they've come up there at 34 percent on

Scott:

the 18 to 35, 34, 32 percent of the 35 to 54, and then 48 percent of the 55s plus.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

So anyway, so a surprising number of young people willing to see Australia as an ally

Trevor:

of the U S and then, in terms of gender, males 26 percent wanting to see Australia

Trevor:

as an ally of the US, female only 14%.

Trevor:

So that's all ages, but definitely a more of a male thing to be

Trevor:

putting those two together.

Trevor:

Male and young more likely to take the conservative, what I would have

Trevor:

thought is the conservative approach of seeing Australia as an ally of

Trevor:

the US rather than independent.

Trevor:

Anyway.

Trevor:

still on Essential Poll, looking at Australia's relationship with China.

Trevor:

And seeing it as a positive opportunity, seeing it as a complex relationship to

Trevor:

be managed and seeing it as a threat.

Trevor:

And 67% said it's complicated to be managed, 20%.

Trevor:

said it's a threat.

Trevor:

And is that 20, 13%, 87%.

Trevor:

13 said it is an opportunity that's sort of overall.

Trevor:

But looking by gender, males were more likely to see it as a threat,

Trevor:

16%, as opposed to females, 10%.

Trevor:

So it's views on our relationship with China, that males see it

Trevor:

more as a threat than females do.

Trevor:

And this one.

Trevor:

this is all Australian by the way, Views on Israel's military action in Gaza,

Trevor:

which of the following is closest to your view on Israel's military action in Gaza?

Trevor:

first one, Israel is justified in its military action.

Trevor:

Second, Israel should agree to a temporary ceasefire.

Trevor:

Third option was Israel should permanently withdraw.

Trevor:

Fourth option was unsure.

Trevor:

And finally, 18 percent of Australians think Israel is justified in

Trevor:

continuing its military action.

Trevor:

20 percent say they should cease fire temporarily.

Trevor:

And 37 percent say withdraw permanently.

Trevor:

18 percent go ahead Israel, do what you're doing.

Trevor:

Have these people know.

Trevor:

I

Scott:

just don't think they give a shit, do they,

Trevor:

you know?

Trevor:

Yeah, you know, I'm gonna have to, I've got slight reading,

Trevor:

I've got a problem with my eyes.

Trevor:

Well.

Trevor:

I can read a book fine.

Trevor:

I can see in the distance fine.

Trevor:

Arm's length where a computer screen is, is where I'm just struggling a fraction.

Trevor:

Just so I can see what I, these graphs.

Trevor:

break that down by gender and males, 26 percent are saying, go ahead Israel, keep

Trevor:

doing what you're doing, it's justified.

Trevor:

Whereas only 11 percent of females would say the same thing.

Trevor:

So those.

Trevor:

Those three issues definitely show significant gender differences, I

Trevor:

think, in the way Australians think.

Trevor:

Which is kind of in line, Joe, with the previous article saying

Trevor:

that, at least in Gen Z, women more likely to be progressive, men

Trevor:

more likely to be conservative.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

So, yep.

Trevor:

Hmm.

Trevor:

Do you guys remember how the Pharmacy Guild was really upset when the

Trevor:

government allowed 60 day prescriptions?

Trevor:

So rather than having to get a script, for 30 days, you could get a 60 day

Trevor:

script and it was just, they'd be ruined?

Trevor:

Well, reports have come out that, 87 new pharmacies have started up, since, 2011.

Trevor:

That change took place, which is a 50 percent uptick from

Trevor:

the same time last year.

Trevor:

So, presumably, not the problem that the Pharmacy Guild was suggesting

Trevor:

it would be, if, it's actually a huge uptick in pharmacies compared

Trevor:

to the same time last year.

Joe:

Well, I'd like to see a longer period of time than just one year,

Trevor:

but yes.

Trevor:

There we go.

Trevor:

We're rattling through some topics here on our way to TikTok, There's a

Trevor:

Nobel laureate economist, Angus Deaton, has delivered a rebuke to his own

Trevor:

profession, what are his credentials?

Trevor:

He's an economic doyen from central casting, a bow tie wearing

Trevor:

econometrician, PhD at Cambridge.

Trevor:

He's been at Princeton for 40 years.

Trevor:

He's currently the Eisenhower Professor of Economics and

Trevor:

International Affairs Emeritus.

Trevor:

He won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2015.

Trevor:

And according to this article in Crikey, he's just dropped an almighty bucket

Trevor:

of shit on his entire profession.

Trevor:

So he lobs a bunch of truth bombs, saying that he's had a changing

Trevor:

of his mind about economics.

Trevor:

That he's practiced for over half a century and largely he was saying that

Trevor:

we've stopped in economics thinking about ethics and what constitutes human

Trevor:

well being and that if economists just focus on efficiency and leave equity to

Trevor:

others, then our recommendations become little more than a license for plunder.

Trevor:

And he says historians who understand about contingency and multiple

Trevor:

and multi directional causality.

Trevor:

Who's that?

Trevor:

What's that noise there?

Trevor:

That's me.

Trevor:

Rhymey.

Trevor:

Oh, right.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

wow, that's bucketing down.

Trevor:

It is, yeah, but it'll stop very shortly.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

where are we?

Trevor:

Yes, you've just moved, that's good.

Trevor:

historians who understand about contingency and multiple and

Trevor:

multi direction causality often do a better job than economists.

Trevor:

And, he talks about the shame that unions have disappeared because they contributed

Trevor:

to a Wages Share for Working People.

Trevor:

But his main point, is about power.

Trevor:

He says, Our emphasis on the virtues of free competitive markets and exogenous

Trevor:

technical change can distract us from the importance of power in setting prices

Trevor:

and wages, in choosing the direction of technological change and in influencing

Trevor:

politics to change the rules of the game.

Trevor:

So this economist has suddenly discovered, power, and as Bernard

Trevor:

Keane in Crikey says, Deaton has only belatedly realised modern capitalism,

Trevor:

particularly in its neoliberal form that disempowers governments and rivals

Trevor:

like trade unions, is about the use of power by corporations to change the

Trevor:

rules of the game, to increase certainty for themselves and to reduce it for

Trevor:

competitors, workers and consumers.

Trevor:

It speaks volumes about how sheltered many mainstream academic economists really are.

Trevor:

So yeah, a Nobel laureate for economics dropping the almighty bucket of shit on

Trevor:

his profession saying they haven't taken into account power imbalance enough.

Trevor:

I just hear the name and think of

Joe:

the presenter of Have I Got News For You in the

Trevor:

UK.

Trevor:

Angus Deaton, is that his name?

Trevor:

Yes.

Joe:

Who got into trouble for his, frequenting of prostitutes and use

Trevor:

of cocaine, I think was the Well.

Trevor:

Because I've been saying for a while now that economics is just this dark

Trevor:

art, rather than a true science, and it's been dressed up with science.

Trevor:

Mathematical models to try and make something science y out of it.

Trevor:

But, they've really got some fundamental things wrong in economics.

Trevor:

And the experiments have been run and people are now starting to realise,

Trevor:

what a shitty sort of advice we've been getting from economists on the

Trevor:

whole over the last hundred odd years.

Trevor:

We should all go to school especially.

Trevor:

Yeah, exactly.

Trevor:

So There's a lot of myth busting to happen with economics, I think, so Certainly

Joe:

in terms of power, there's been arguments that Alphabet and Apple,

Joe:

who are two of the largest, they have economies that are bigger than

Joe:

two thirds of the world's countries.

Joe:

And obviously they have a unnatural effect in terms of international affairs as an

Joe:

international You know, just, just the sheer amount of money that they could

Joe:

make or break a, make or break a country.

Trevor:

Yep.

Trevor:

And just the fundamental need for young economies need protections and

Trevor:

artificial protectionism in order to nurture new industries and, to

Trevor:

keep multinational competitors out while they get a, a manufacturing

Trevor:

or an industrial economy going.

Trevor:

And it's.

Trevor:

That's one of the most fundamental misunderstandings people have, that

Trevor:

they think, Oh, you just need to open up these third world economies to allow

Trevor:

them, you know, to, to enter the free market and allow the free market to enter

Trevor:

them and, and efficiencies will develop.

Trevor:

America was in successful countries that were built on Initial protectionism that

Trevor:

they could get their industries underway.

Trevor:

And then once they were underway, they were like, Oh, well, we should be opening

Trevor:

up to the entire world because they've got, they've got the scale by then.

Trevor:

If you actually.

Scott:

I sort of disagree with what you're saying there, because if you

Scott:

actually allow them to lock themselves away from the international market and

Scott:

that type of thing, is it for a temporary period or is that for a longer period?

Scott:

As

Trevor:

long as necessary for the industry to gain control.

Trevor:

It's foothold and it's expertise.

Trevor:

Okay,

Scott:

so Australia, when should we have dropped our manufacturing, when should

Scott:

we have dropped our manufacturing tariffs on our clothing and textile industry?

Trevor:

Well if we wanted to keep, if the plan was to keep that industry

Trevor:

and develop it in a way that we could eventually be competitive on

Trevor:

the world stage, however long that takes, but that was never the plan.

Trevor:

And what you're looking at there is Australia was an advanced economy

Trevor:

that moved into service delivery and abandoned manufacturing.

Trevor:

But thinking of places like Latin America, where they're essentially

Trevor:

agricultural, economies who might want to develop a manufacturing base, start

Trevor:

making washing machines or cars or something, you can't run those industries

Trevor:

while multinationals can import cheap.

Trevor:

Product you have to give that protection while that local industry develops

Trevor:

expertise And then once they've got the expertise they can compete

Trevor:

which is exactly what China did.

Scott:

Yeah, okay Yeah If we just take the example of China and Mexico right

Scott:

now because Donald Trump has already threatened That if he's elected and

Scott:

that sort of stuff, he was he will slap a 100% tariff on Chinese cars

Scott:

that are manufactured in Mexico before they cross the border into the U.

Scott:

S.

Scott:

Now, I don't understand what Mexico could have done to avoid that type of

Scott:

thing, because they have followed the rules, they have done exactly what

Scott:

they've been told, they have developed a manufacturing industry down there, and

Scott:

now they're exporting stuff to the U.

Scott:

S.

Trevor:

Well, what's happened is that the US banned Chinese or put

Trevor:

on huge tariffs on Chinese imports.

Trevor:

Yeah, I understand and so Mexico has become a backdoor for Chinese trade So

Trevor:

when you look at the graphs of Chinese trade into America on the face of it,

Trevor:

it's dropped But if you then take into account the increase that's gone through

Trevor:

via Mexico, it's clearly been operating as a backdoor for Chinese imports.

Trevor:

Do you support Donald

Scott:

Trump as he's saying he wants to slap a 100 percent tariff on those cars?

Scott:

Like he wants, he wants, he wants the BYD car and that sort of stuff,

Scott:

because that is what's scaring the shit out of the American car

Trevor:

manufacturers right now, is

Scott:

because that BYD is talking about producing a car.

Scott:

In Mexico, and then they're going to sell it over in the U.

Scott:

S.

Scott:

for around about 25,

Trevor:

000.

Trevor:

Which is significantly

Scott:

lower than what a

Trevor:

Tesla is selling for.

Trevor:

I don't understand.

Trevor:

If any country wants to put in a tariff regime to protect an industry that it sees

Trevor:

as vital to its interests, go right ahead.

Trevor:

But don't complain when other countries do it as well.

Trevor:

That's the, that isn't the point.

Scott:

This is the whole bloody problem.

Scott:

If you get into a trade war and that sort of stuff that, you know, everyone's

Scott:

just slapping tariffs on and it's

Joe:

So, the reason you might want to keep a manufacturing base up is in case of war.

Trevor:

Or pandemic.

Trevor:

When you can't make a ventilator.

Trevor:

And you can't transport it.

Trevor:

We couldn't make ventilators.

Trevor:

If we had some manufacturing capacity, it would be We might have been able to

Scott:

say Yeah, okay, I can understand that.

Scott:

I can understand that you're going to have, you know, that sort of

Scott:

thing is that it's a very specialised piece of equipment, that type of

Scott:

thing, it's just, I think you could actually argue that that's got to be

Trevor:

protected over here.

Trevor:

But,

Scott:

I'm not so convinced that the car industry deserves protection.

Joe:

Well, and the argument was, during the Second World War,

Joe:

The car manufacturers turned their hands to producing, tanks.

Joe:

Well, we didn't have, we didn't, we didn't have a company in Australia.

Joe:

The reason, the reason why U S and Europe wants to, and not have it shipped all

Joe:

off to China, for instance, is that in the case of a war, sure, you've got your,

Joe:

whatever stock of tanks now, but if you needed to ramp up and do what the Russians

Joe:

did in the second world war, we just don't have the, Capability of doing that.

Trevor:

If, if you demand free trade, then you're essentially,

Trevor:

making it easy for the existing powerful players to remain powerful.

Trevor:

'cause they can just come in and squash any newcomers before they get, get going.

Trevor:

So protectionism is fine if, if your ultimate game is to protect

Trevor:

the industry until it becomes.

Trevor:

Efficient enough to compete, or even if it doesn't become efficient enough

Trevor:

to compete, but in the national interests, you think you need a

Trevor:

subsidized manufacturing industry, for example, that just for your balance of

Trevor:

your economy and security, for cause of war or pandemic or other things.

Trevor:

You need, to keep certain industries and you're prepared to pay the subsidies.

Trevor:

So just the sort of freedom of movement of global international goods is great

Trevor:

when you're the powerful dominant player, who goes around squashing

Trevor:

people, which is what's been happening.

Trevor:

I mean, that's what the IMF and the World Bank did to so many developed,

Trevor:

well, developing countries, third world countries in the South.

Trevor:

It's it.

Trevor:

Here's a loan, but the condition is you've got to allow outside entrants to come

Trevor:

in and sell whatever into your country.

Trevor:

You're really good at making, at growing bananas, so you keep

Trevor:

growing bananas and leave washing machines and cars to other countries.

Trevor:

End.

Trevor:

That's why they never got, manufacturing industries.

Trevor:

And countries like America did exactly that.

Trevor:

They, they put in tariffs and restrictions to, to protect their

Trevor:

infant industries until they got big enough that they didn't need it.

Trevor:

That's the story of economics.

Scott:

Yeah, I know, that's the history lesson of it, but I just don't think that,

Scott:

you can say to any emerging economy and that sort of stuff that you can protect

Scott:

your industries right now, and then in 10 or 20 years time you've got to wind

Scott:

back your tariffs because I just think to myself that they're not going to bother.

Scott:

Because once they've got, once they've got their manufacturing and everything up, and

Scott:

they're employing the numbers of people that are required for that type of thing,

Scott:

I just don't think that they're going to be interested in lowering their tariff

Trevor:

barriers.

Trevor:

Well, but

Joe:

if they want to export.

Joe:

Sorry?

Joe:

If they want to export.

Joe:

So you build up your manufacturing base, and you've tapped out your national base.

Joe:

market and you want to expand overseas, then you start

Joe:

doing, you know, tit for tat.

Joe:

If I want to export to the US, which is a huge market, then I

Joe:

have to, you know, allow traffic in

Trevor:

reverse.

Trevor:

So other countries will say, no, not mailing your goods in because

Trevor:

you've got these tariffs here.

Trevor:

So at some point the country goes, well, we're just going to pay that

Trevor:

price because It's in our interests, or it becomes politically unsavoury.

Trevor:

So Australia made the decision.

Trevor:

We didn't want to subsidise a clothing manufacturing industry.

Trevor:

There wasn't the will to do it.

Trevor:

So we let it go.

Trevor:

There we go.

Trevor:

I'm sure in this article, let me just find it here.

Trevor:

We just talked about this Nobel Laureate, ta ta ta ta, talked about

Trevor:

multi nationals, can't find it, anyway, and just finally, still from Crikey,

Trevor:

the Reserve Bank trashed the economy, and for what, and basically, that.

Trevor:

Yesterday's, well now this must be an old article, the December quarter national

Trevor:

accounts from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, so from the ABS, information

Trevor:

came out to say that in December, quarter on quarter growth was just 0.

Trevor:

2%, in per capita terms the economy contracted by 0.

Trevor:

8 percent in the December quarter.

Trevor:

Bullock and the RBA board had made a call, to increase interest rates.

Trevor:

At the time, retail sales were up 1.

Trevor:

5 percent in November.

Trevor:

But the ABS said that's because consumers are feeling the stress and they're taking

Trevor:

advantage of discounting by retailers during Black Friday and other events.

Trevor:

It's not because it's a buoyant economy, it's because shoppers

Trevor:

are getting in early on discounts.

Trevor:

And that's why sales were up 1.

Trevor:

5 percent in November, which the Reserve Bank took for a buoyant economy that

Trevor:

needed a further whack around the head.

Trevor:

And and in fact what happened was sales slid 2.

Trevor:

1 percent in the normally buoyant month of December.

Trevor:

And, as I said in the Crikey article, it's a pretty sorry state of affairs

Trevor:

when the country's statisticians The Australian Bureau of Statistics can see

Trevor:

what's happening to an important area of household spending while the so called

Trevor:

premier economic analysts at the Reserve Bank make desperate consumers, a mistake.

Trevor:

Desperate consumers for an overheating economy.

Trevor:

Sorry, what's that Joe?

Trevor:

I'm waiting for

Joe:

them to say, well, this is a per capita problem.

Joe:

And so we just need to do some decapitation and

Trevor:

solve the problem.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

That's probably what they'd come out with.

Trevor:

So, so just.

Trevor:

Hopeless at the RBA, people buying up in, the ABS proves that it was people

Trevor:

buying in November because they were broke, getting something cheap, and

Trevor:

the RBA took that for a buoyant economy that needed a whack around the head.

Trevor:

And our stupid treasurer, Jim Chalmers, wanted to get rid of those,

Trevor:

the reserve power that allowed the government in emergencies to override

Trevor:

the Reserve Bank on monetary policy.

Trevor:

For God's sake, just, oh, for God's sake.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

8.

Trevor:

59.

Trevor:

We've gone an hour and we're only just getting to TikTok.

Trevor:

Well, it's going to be a long one.

Trevor:

Ah.

Trevor:

I find this TikTok thing to basically encapsulate the

Trevor:

world we're in at the moment.

Trevor:

So let, anybody got to go anywhere?

Trevor:

You're reaching for a second beer there, Scott, are you?

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Settle in.

Trevor:

Let me find a video to set the scene for the TikTok fiasco.

Trevor:

This, dear listener, is, who is this lady, Ashley Hinson, Republican, proud mum

Trevor:

and wife representing Iowa in Congress.

Trevor:

And she's bringing a dose of Iowa common sense to Washington.

Trevor:

That's how she describes herself in her Twitter profile, so.

Trevor:

Let's, see the mood amongst congressmen and women in America when it comes to

Trevor:

TikTok and your average person in Iowa.

Trevor:

Well hi everyone, this is your congresswoman, Ashley Hinson.

Trevor:

As a mom of two boys in middle school, I understand the challenges

Trevor:

surrounding kids social media use.

Trevor:

And as a member of Congress, I can tell you that TikTok is a Chinese Trojan

Trevor:

horse used to steal Americans data.

Trevor:

It's used to control the narrative on key issues in our country and

Trevor:

to hurt our kids mental health.

Trevor:

So that's why I helped to introduce legislation that would force TikTok

Trevor:

to cut ties with its parent company.

Trevor:

By Dance, a company that is beholden to China.

Trevor:

They'd have to do this in order to keep operating in the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

Now, as many of you have heard, TikTok is spreading a lot of misinformation.

Trevor:

They're telling users that we in Congress are going to ban TikTok.

Trevor:

They took it way too far last week by sending out a push alert

Trevor:

to young kids, prompting pure panic about the app's future.

Trevor:

So let me set the record straight.

Trevor:

We are working in Congress to pass legislation to protect your privacy.

Trevor:

Protect our national security.

Trevor:

and to keep your phone safe from hacks.

Trevor:

We are working to ensure that China does not control the content that you see.

Trevor:

TikTok wants you to think they get you, but they're working hard to control

Trevor:

you and to control what you think.

Trevor:

ByteDance, which is TikTok's parent company, is tracking your

Trevor:

keystrokes, your passwords, and your phone activity to advance China's

Trevor:

intelligence and influence in the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

So think about it like a Chinese spy balloon right in your phone.

Trevor:

It's pretty simple.

Trevor:

All TikTok has to do is to sever ties with China to keep their American users.

Trevor:

So I am proud to lead this effort and will continue working to ensure that China

Trevor:

cannot exert control over our country or continue hurting our kids through TikTok.

Trevor:

The time is up for this Chinese spyware.

Trevor:

There you go.

Trevor:

It's just like a Chinese spy balloon.

Trevor:

Guys, and what did we find out about Chinese spy balloons?

Trevor:

They definitely exist, but they weren't spying on anything.

Trevor:

It was a complete beat up to say that this is just like the Chinese spy balloon.

Trevor:

That was the only thing she said that was That was correct.

Trevor:

That was the only thing that, and she, it is exactly like a

Scott:

Chinese spy balloon.

Scott:

Yeah, I

Trevor:

understand that.

Trevor:

Complete bullshit.

Scott:

The Chinese spy balloon was shot down by the Yanks and that sort

Scott:

of stuff, and I agreed wholeheartedly with them because something blew off

Scott:

course and all that sort of stuff.

Scott:

It invaded U.

Scott:

S.

Scott:

airspace, so they had to

Trevor:

take it out, so they shot it down.

Trevor:

It accidentally crossed U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

airspace.

Trevor:

Yeah, I know.

Trevor:

It didn't invade U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

airspace.

Scott:

Okay, whatever, it accidentally found its way there, they had to shoot it

Scott:

down, so it was shot down, that was it.

Scott:

Now, the whole thing was, the Yanks were very secretive about it and

Scott:

all that sort of stuff, it made us, made them look like idiots, you

Scott:

know, because I think once, once you finally found out what was on the spy

Scott:

balloon, they found out it was nothing.

Trevor:

Which is what the case is when it comes to TikTok as well.

Trevor:

Yeah, I know.

Scott:

It's also like, you know, when I was listening to her nonsense

Scott:

where she said that, you know, They're in there stealing your

Scott:

passwords and all that sort of shit.

Scott:

I just thought to myself, Jesus

Trevor:

Christ, you know, this woman's a nut.

Trevor:

Mm hmm.

Trevor:

That's one of the few things that Congress has agreed on

Trevor:

very quickly in recent times.

Trevor:

Yeah, I know.

Trevor:

So, they've come together.

Trevor:

She's a nut.

Trevor:

Well, to, to

Scott:

no to to pass legislation, to actually pass legislation to be in TikTok,

Trevor:

to, for the change of ownership of TikTok.

Trevor:

Otherwise, it's not allowed to operate in.

Trevor:

So, Yeah, cause they're

Joe:

concerned that, Facebook is losing market

Trevor:

share.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Well, well, it's this McCarthyism of, you know, red's under the bed, you

Trevor:

know, Chinese under your, in your phone.

Trevor:

Is white dead

Scott:

earned by the Chinese government or not?

Trevor:

Well, we're going to get to that.

Trevor:

So, well, let me actually give you the exact bit on that.

Trevor:

So.

Trevor:

so this is according to the TikTok website, but I think we can take this

Trevor:

sort of factual information as being true.

Trevor:

So myth, TikTok's parent company ByteDance is Chinese owned, and they say fact,

Trevor:

TikTok's parent company ByteDance was founded by Chinese entrepreneurs, but

Trevor:

today roughly 60 percent of the company.

Trevor:

is owned by global institutional investors, such as the Carlyle

Trevor:

Group, General Atlantic, and Susquehanna International Group.

Trevor:

So 60 percent international.

Trevor:

An additional 20 percent of the company is owned by ByteDance employees around

Trevor:

the world, including Australians.

Trevor:

And the remaining 20 percent is owned by the company's founder,

Trevor:

who is a private individual.

Trevor:

It is not part of any state or government entity.

Trevor:

So, the parent company ByteDance owns Well, and TikTok doesn't

Trevor:

operate in mainland China.

Trevor:

there's a different, software, I'll get to the name of it in a second, which, which

Trevor:

they control, but which runs in China.

Trevor:

No, that's WeChat, isn't it?

Trevor:

no, it is, let me just see here.

Trevor:

It is Douyin, D O U Y I N.

Trevor:

So that's the Chinese version of TikTok.

Trevor:

And, So no TikTok in China.

Trevor:

Instead, they're using, ion and the Chinese government owns 1% of ion.

Trevor:

That's what it owns.

Trevor:

So for by dance itself, that owns TikTok.

Trevor:

No.

Trevor:

60% international, 20% employees, 20%.

Trevor:

The original Chinese founder, it owns, by dance, owns Doyon.

Trevor:

And the Chinese government owns 1%.

Trevor:

And it does that because, if you have a media organisation in China,

Trevor:

then the government by law has to own 1 percent as part of the media.

Trevor:

Wikipedia says this is a golden share,

Joe:

which allows it to outvote everybody

Trevor:

else on the board.

Trevor:

And in Douyin or in ByteDance?

Trevor:

In ByteDance.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

And that, is a myth.

Trevor:

So, let me just see what they say here.

Trevor:

So, myth.

Trevor:

The Chinese government has a golden share interest in ByteDance.

Trevor:

And the fact.

Trevor:

As required under Chinese law, in order to operate certain news

Trevor:

and information products that are exclusively in China, media license

Trevor:

is required for those services.

Trevor:

As such, an entity affiliated with the Chinese government owns 1 percent of

Trevor:

the ByteDance subsidiary, ByteDance.

Trevor:

com.

Trevor:

and it says this is a common arrangement for companies operating news and

Trevor:

information platforms in China.

Trevor:

This arrangement is specific to services in the Chinese market and has no bearing

Trevor:

on ByteDance's global operations outside of China, including TikTok, which

Trevor:

does not operate in mainly in China.

Trevor:

So

Trevor:

who do we believe, Wikipedia or the TikTok

Joe:

company that possibly has an interest in telling you?

Trevor:

But the author of the Wikipedia article, who do we know?

Trevor:

Wikipedia has to

Joe:

reference, so it references a Reuters article

Trevor:

and a couple of others.

Trevor:

You could probably jump onto Wikipedia and write the contrary

Trevor:

article based on the reference to TikTok's own public statements.

Trevor:

Sorry.

Trevor:

I'm prepared to go with the TikTok version, but we'll, we'll see.

Trevor:

So, that gives you a little picture anyway.

Trevor:

TikTok is the non Chinese version.

Trevor:

Douyin is the Chinese version.

Trevor:

And, this guy on TikTok, on Twitter, Brendan Carr, was saying, In America,

Trevor:

TikTok pushes videos to kids that promote self harm, eating disorders and suicide.

Trevor:

In China The version of TikTok available there.

Trevor:

The app shows young kids science experiments, museum exhibits,

Trevor:

and other educational material.

Trevor:

And a guy I follow a lot on Chinese stuff is Arnaud Bertrand,

Trevor:

and he says, this is false.

Trevor:

There's been lots of scandals in China about Douyin, the Chinese version of

Trevor:

TikTok, and the harm it did to kids, including a scandal about a famous

Trevor:

influencer who live streamed her suicide, and a scandal about, eating disorders.

Trevor:

Which is why contrary to the US, the Chinese government legislated Douyin,

Trevor:

and put in all sorts of limitations in terms of content, moderation, number

Trevor:

of hours, kids could be on it, etc.

Trevor:

TikTok in the US, it's down to the US legislators.

Trevor:

If they wanted to, US legislators could, implement the exact rules as China.

Trevor:

There'd be absolutely nothing that prevents them to do so.

Trevor:

In fact, TikTok was created for this very reason, because the mother company

Trevor:

ByteDance knew that given the ecosystems and culture in China and the rest of

Trevor:

the world were so completely different, you simply could not have the same app.

Trevor:

So Douyin was to be regulated by the Chinese government and

Trevor:

adapted to Chinese citizens.

Trevor:

TikTok was to be regulated by the West and adapted to their citizens.

Trevor:

And he says it's not China's fault if the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

doesn't.

Trevor:

Doesn't take their regulation job seriously.

Trevor:

So Joe, when it comes to like the, the golden share that allows China to do

Trevor:

whatever it wants, China, Chinese company can do whatever it wants with, with

Trevor:

a company in China, anyway, without a share, like they can just, they can just

Trevor:

say, you're going to do this, even if they don't even own a share, they don't

Trevor:

need it for things that happen in China.

Trevor:

U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

government do the same in the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

Yeah, so the sort of, the idea of, you know, this golden share is kind of a

Trevor:

bit, red herring, if you like, because we're talking about power, and when it

Trevor:

comes to things happening in China, the Chinese government can do whatever they

Trevor:

like, golden share or not, in terms of regulating what companies do in

Joe:

China.

Joe:

Yeah, the question is, do they have control over the power

Trevor:

of the company?

Trevor:

And, If the parent company's operations are outside of China, then you'd have

Trevor:

to say that would be difficult to do.

Trevor:

So Yes, but if, if

Joe:

the board operate, because the head office is in China.

Trevor:

No, it's not.

Trevor:

So if the board are in China No, it's not.

Trevor:

So the head office is in, Singapore.

Trevor:

Singapore.

Trevor:

Is it?

Trevor:

yeah.

Trevor:

So the CEO is, he's Singaporean.

Trevor:

Yep.

Trevor:

So it's got, it's established in Los Angeles and Singapore, so, Just

Trevor:

a few more bits about, ByteDance, well actually let me just go back

Trevor:

to, we're still talking about image, that sort of stuff, Decisions, myth,

Trevor:

decisions about TikTok are made in Beijing, and here's their response.

Trevor:

ByteDance.

Trevor:

TikTok's CEO is a third generation Singaporean based in Singapore.

Trevor:

He oversees all key day to day and strategic decision

Trevor:

making when it comes to TikTok.

Trevor:

The COO, Guy Pappas is an Australian based in the United States.

Trevor:

He oversees content, operations, marketing and product teams for TikTok.

Trevor:

The senior leadership team is based in Singapore, the United States and Ireland.

Trevor:

as we expected with any subsidiary of a holding company, high level

Trevor:

discussions around financial matters and corporate governance are made in

Trevor:

concert with ByteDance board and the CEO.

Trevor:

None of those individuals reside in mainland China.

Trevor:

So, what they say here is it's an entertainment app.

Trevor:

The content of TikTok is generated by the community.

Trevor:

So, it's up to the community to generate the content.

Trevor:

And the secret source of TikTok is, of course, the algorithm that,

Trevor:

keeps people in there watching it.

Trevor:

And, it says here, there are no TikTok content moderators in China.

Trevor:

Content moderation on TikTok is overseen by our Singapore, US and

Trevor:

Ireland led trust and safety teams.

Trevor:

it says, the myth that the Chinese government could compel ByteDance to

Trevor:

share Australian TikTok user data.

Trevor:

And it says Australian TikTok user data is stored in Singapore, Malaysia

Trevor:

and the US, subject to local laws.

Trevor:

TikTok does not store user data in China and has not shared Australian

Trevor:

user data with the Chinese government and would not even if it asked.

Trevor:

But apparently my understanding is, that the reason Facebook and Twitter

Trevor:

don't operate in China is because the Chinese said, we don't want you storing,

Trevor:

Chinese citizen data outside of China.

Trevor:

And Facebook and the rest refused.

Trevor:

So that's why they don't operate in China.

Trevor:

So the concerns that the West has, oh, the data is held in China and the

Trevor:

Chinese will get their hands on it and cause problem for our citizens.

Trevor:

Is wrong.

Trevor:

The data is not held in China.

Trevor:

That's the same concern that China had about Facebook.

Trevor:

interesting sort of switch up there.

Trevor:

So, ah, what else have we got here in the Myth vs.

Trevor:

Fact section?

Trevor:

uh, okay.

Trevor:

That was the main Myth vs.

Trevor:

Fact stuff.

Trevor:

Just on, you know, everything from China is a security threat.

Trevor:

There was an article from the New York Times.

Trevor:

Headline, Biden calls Chinese electric vehicles a security threat.

Trevor:

there's an article from the BBC.

Trevor:

Chinese garlic is a national security risk, says US Senator.

Trevor:

An article from the Wall Street Journal.

Trevor:

Pentagon sees giant cargo cranes as possible Chinese spying tools.

Trevor:

An article from, I can't read that one.

Trevor:

China may be spying on you through your coffee maker, expert says.

Trevor:

I think that's news.

Trevor:

New York Times.

Trevor:

Fearing spy trains, Congress may ban a Chinese maker of subway cars.

Trevor:

And of course we all know about the Chinese spy balloon.

Scott:

So.

Joe:

Well, in terms of the cars, I would be worried, I'm, I'm worried about Tesla.

Joe:

Apparently Tesla have shut down the cars of people who've been critical.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

So there's been some really weird stuff going on.

Joe:

Basically, all these, modern cars phone home for every,

Joe:

electronic thing that they do.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

I, I have a friend who works on, the integration piece of all, electronic,

Joe:

all the control systems, all the drive by wire systems, all go through.

Joe:

And he says all functions now literally phone back.

Joe:

To the main server, the, the manufacturer's server.

Joe:

Yep.

Joe:

for permission before they'll enable a module.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

So you, you remember BMW famously were going to charge for heated seats.

Joe:

Well, you were gonna have to subscribe and pay so many dollars a year to have your

Trevor:

heated seats turned off.

Trevor:

Yes, I do.

Trevor:

Yes, we did that story.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Joe:

So.

Joe:

All new cars, basically every function that you press an electronic button

Joe:

on the dashboard, it phones home to find out whether you're allowed

Joe:

to do that before it'll do that.

Joe:

And all of these manufacturers, if they so choose, could turn off your car remote.

Joe:

And they're saying worse than that, if these cars are in an area where they have

Joe:

no mobile coverage and lose battery power, so they've lost their settings, When you

Joe:

power them back up and they can't phone home to find out whether you're allowed

Joe:

to do anything, the car won't even start.

Trevor:

See, there's an argument though, if you accept that, these social platforms

Trevor:

are going to collect all this data on you, if you want to use one and you're

Trevor:

American, you, you'd be better off using TikTok because the Chinese government

Trevor:

has no, control over you, whereas the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

government does.

Trevor:

So if, if, if they were all gathering data about you and you were worried

Trevor:

about them using it against you, you'd actually rather someone like the

Trevor:

Chinese have it than the Americans, because they've got no, jurisdiction

Trevor:

over you, if that makes sense.

Trevor:

just in terms of what they collect.

Trevor:

They say, TikTok's privacy policy describes the data the company collects.

Trevor:

To be clear, the current versions of TikTok app do not monitor

Trevor:

keystrokes or content of what people type when they use our in

Trevor:

app browser or third party websites.

Trevor:

and do not collect precise GPS location in Australia.

Trevor:

We only collect approximate location information to ensure a

Trevor:

relevant user experience including being served the right ads.

Trevor:

And that does not use face or voice prints to identify individuals.

Trevor:

I remember when we were talking about this, not so long ago, where TikTok

Trevor:

basically said to the authorities, Come and look at our software, come

Trevor:

and look under the hood, come and see that what we're saying is true.

Trevor:

We're just not going to let you look at the algorithm that determines how

Trevor:

Things show up in front of people.

Trevor:

But all this sort of stuff, you can look at our coding to

Trevor:

confirm what we're saying is true.

Trevor:

So, do you remember us talking about that or not?

Trevor:

Is that just my imagination?

Trevor:

I don't

Scott:

remember us talking about that.

Trevor:

I don't remember.

Trevor:

Yeah, anyway, I'll try and find that somewhere because

Trevor:

I'm sure we talked about that.

Trevor:

anyway, guess what opposition leader Peter Dutton wants to do?

Trevor:

He

Scott:

wants to ban TikTok in Australia just like the US does.

Scott:

He's a dickhead.

Trevor:

Correct, looking at hashtags on TikTok.

Trevor:

This was in a seven day period to December 22, 22nd of December, 2023.

Trevor:

so hashtags on TikTok.

Trevor:

The top, well, Free Palestine, 82 million.

Trevor:

Free Palestine with a love heart emoji and a Palestinian flag.

Trevor:

I'll then give you the next, sort of, most popular hashtags on the

Trevor:

topic of Palestine Gaza Israel.

Trevor:

Free Gaza, Free Palestine, Palestine TikTok, Save Gaza, Stand with

Trevor:

Palestine, I Stand with Palestine, From the River to the Sea, Save

Trevor:

Palestine, End the Occupation, Pray for Palestine, Palestine will be free.

Trevor:

They're all pro Palestinian.

Trevor:

The first hashtag that then comes up is I Stand with Israel,

Trevor:

with two million hashtags.

Trevor:

So, the views on something like Israel and Hamas on TikTok.

Trevor:

Tik Tok are very much pro Palestine, which might be a reason you think to

Trevor:

get rid of it from the US point of view.

Trevor:

But, apparently Facebook and Instagram show a remarkably similar

Trevor:

gap when it comes to their hashtags.

Trevor:

On Facebook, the hashtag free Palestine is found on more than 11 million

Trevor:

posts, 30 times, 39 times more than those with hashtag stand with Israel.

Trevor:

so that's interesting that, even the other ones are very pro

Trevor:

Palestine compared to Israel.

Trevor:

So tiktoks actually not that out of place.

Scott:

It's one of those things, I just think to myself that, this is what I was

Scott:

saying when I was last on here, when I said that, this is leading to a change

Scott:

of the opinion about Israel, you know, it's, I'm not surprised to read that,

Scott:

that you've got all these pro Palestinian hashtags, you know, from the river to

Scott:

the seas, the only one offends me, but, you know, all the rest of them are fine.

Scott:

Mm mm.

Trevor:

So, I read an article.

Trevor:

I'll have a look at the comments by people in a moment, but just,

Trevor:

last couple of things on this.

Trevor:

So, as you know, dear listener, one of the, pains I go through on your

Trevor:

behalf is to read the courier mail.

Trevor:

The courier fail, religiously.

Trevor:

If that's not worth signing up to the Patreon for, I don't know what is.

Trevor:

Do you get it

Scott:

delivered in paper or do you just grab it electronically?

Scott:

Just

Trevor:

digital, yeah.

Trevor:

Electronically, yeah.

Trevor:

So, this article from the Courier Mail, Clock is ticking to block TikTok,

Trevor:

and story about, you know, obviously the US decision, and um, now, Home

Trevor:

Affairs Minister, Claire O'Neill, in the government, she said, We're

Trevor:

monitoring the progress of the bill in the US and will take additional action

Trevor:

if and when relevant agencies advise us to It is appropriate to do so.

Trevor:

God's sake, Labor.

Trevor:

If some spook in ASIO says, Well, you better get rid of TikTok.

Trevor:

Are you going to just follow that advice?

Trevor:

Are you just going to think about it?

Trevor:

Of your own accord?

Trevor:

No, you're just going to take the advice.

Trevor:

I can tell that's what's going to happen.

Trevor:

But anyway, James Patterson, on the opposition's national security

Trevor:

spokesman, said Australia could not afford to be left behind on the issue.

Trevor:

It says that the Albanese government should be preparing legislation today.

Trevor:

Now in this article, it goes on, cyber security expert Susan McLean said

Trevor:

if the bill progresses in the US, Australia should follow suit, quote,

Trevor:

these decisions and the people that are presenting to Congress and the Pentagon

Trevor:

are whiz bang cyber security experts.

Trevor:

If the American government believes that TikTok is of national security concern.

Trevor:

Then we, as a friend of America, should realise if it is a risk.

Trevor:

If it is a risk in one Western country, then it is a risk in another country.

Trevor:

Dear listener, cyber security expert Susan McLean, when I read that, she's

Trevor:

quoted as saying, these people are whiz bang cyber security experts.

Trevor:

My antenna just went off.

Trevor:

Went off and I'm going, I'm not so sure about the credentials of Susan

Trevor:

McClain as a cyber security expert.

Trevor:

Anyway, she goes on, Australia would have to be mindful of its diplomatic

Trevor:

relations with China, but national security must remain the priority.

Trevor:

Quote, we are geographically closer to China, and we have to be mindful

Trevor:

of maintaining diplomatic relations, but if push comes to shove, if the

Trevor:

company is acting in a way that risks national security, Then that

Trevor:

should be the priority, she said.

Trevor:

And I'm just thinking to myself, who the fuck is this cyber

Trevor:

security expert, Susan McLean?

Trevor:

And a quick Google, and I'm on her website, she's got a website called Cyber

Trevor:

Safety Solutions, where she describes herself as Australia's foremost expert

Trevor:

in the area of cyber safety and was a member of Victoria Police for 27 years.

Trevor:

Widely known as the Cyber Cop, she was the first Victorian police officer

Trevor:

appointed to a position involving cyber safety and young people.

Trevor:

In 2003, she was the Victoria Police Regional Youth Officer of the Year.

Trevor:

She's been awarded the National Medal and the Victorian Police Service

Trevor:

Medal and the National Police Medal.

Trevor:

And in 1994, she took her first report of cyber bullying involving

Trevor:

a group of year eight school girls.

Trevor:

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Trevor:

In short, dear listener, she's just dealt with.

Trevor:

Cyberbullying, children in high school and other stuff like that.

Trevor:

She doesn't

Joe:

understand the technology, she understands its impact in society.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

It's very, very

Trevor:

different.

Trevor:

Exactly.

Trevor:

And she's, on the face of what is on her website, knows nothing about the

Trevor:

topic that we're discussing here.

Trevor:

And she's quoted in the Courier Mail as cyber security expert,

Trevor:

giving her two cents worth.

Trevor:

That's it.

Trevor:

This is just the sort of crap that we have to deal with

Trevor:

every day from this There was a

Joe:

big story about the thousands of motherboards from

Joe:

China With a secret chip in bed.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Yeah

Trevor:

Yeah,

Joe:

I'm sorry.

Joe:

I went and looked that up because I remembered that story it turns out the

Joe:

manufacturer Had built this thing that would automatically download drivers

Joe:

to save you installing the manually So that your machine would automatically

Joe:

have the latest and greatest drivers and that if somebody nefarious had

Joe:

got into that supply path They could automatically push out Nasty software

Joe:

to your computer, but there was nothing in there was no physical thing on the

Trevor:

motherboard No evidence that it was that nefarious purpose.

Trevor:

It was there just as an aid to software updating It was a badly thought out

Joe:

aid

Trevor:

in terms of security.

Trevor:

R.

Trevor:

Not a yes.

Trevor:

It, it, it,

Joe:

it had been, misreported in one source and other sources

Joe:

had just copied and pasted.

Trevor:

Mm-Hmm.

Trevor:

Let's run through the comments, from the most recent going backwards.

Trevor:

Whatley.

Trevor:

Oh, whizbang.

Trevor:

Liam, China has actually done some great work in holding out

Trevor:

against the tech giants, which are anti-competitive and bad for innovation.

Trevor:

Indeed, they have.

Trevor:

John Salmon says the bill probably won't pass the courts.

Trevor:

Hmm, might be held unconstitutional.

Trevor:

James says we have our own James Patterson.

Trevor:

I think that's most of the comments on that.

Trevor:

Well, a year and a half.

Trevor:

This is like the old days, isn't it?

Trevor:

And I've still got a whole, I've got a whole section of subs.

Trevor:

Which I'll reserve for next week.

Joe:

I think we should ban all social media apart from things like

Trevor:

Mastodon.

Trevor:

Yeah, well, do we need to ban them?

Trevor:

Just let people use them and make up their own mind.

Trevor:

It's

Scott:

one of those things, like, you know, I was a very early

Scott:

adopter of Facebook, but now I'm just hardly ever using it.

Joe:

I looked on Facebook recently and I reckon of my news feed in quotes.

Joe:

30 percent is adverts, another 30 percent is news groups, is groups

Joe:

that I've never joined and it's just decided I'm interested in, and 30

Joe:

percent is stuff that I've actually

Trevor:

subscribed to.

Trevor:

Well dear listener, you're lucky you've subscribed to the Iron Fist Velvet Glove

Trevor:

podcast and you've received another 90 minutes of informed commentary.

Trevor:

Hope you've enjoyed it.

Trevor:

We'll speak to you next week, where we'll talk about subs, we'll talk

Trevor:

about Israel and Gaza, we'll talk about what the Pope says about Ukraine.

Trevor:

You might remember, dear listener, a few months ago, other guys here on this

Trevor:

podcast were saying But the counter offensive would sort things out and, I was

Scott:

calling No, what I actually said was that it's going to be slow

Scott:

going and we've got to see what actually is going to happen from that.

Scott:

Now, it appears that Russia has dug in a hell of a lot stronger than

Scott:

the Ukrainians were anticipating.

Scott:

And now that you've got this situation that the West is foundering

Scott:

on actually supporting Ukraine.

Scott:

So, I think that Vladimir Solinsky is going to be forced to go in and do a

Scott:

deal with that bastard, who will actually only use the time and that sort of stuff

Scott:

to build up his forces, and he's going to pinch the whole fucking country.

Scott:

Because he's a

Joe:

prick.

Joe:

Putin has said all along, all he had to do was outweigh the

Joe:

West, the West would get bored.

Joe:

Exactly.

Scott:

Which is what is happening, you know, and I just think to myself that

Trevor:

It's a very interesting moment in time, where we've had just

Trevor:

the US so dominant militarily, and just the idea that, you know, there's

Trevor:

other powers out there, and they can invade a country and get away with it.

Scott:

Ah, but they wouldn't have actually bought, they wouldn't

Scott:

have actually attempted that had there been a signatory to the NATO

Trevor:

treaty.

Trevor:

Maybe not.

Trevor:

But you know, there's just, there's just these challenges to US hegemony.

Trevor:

We've got, you know, the US.

Trevor:

You know, starts confiscating Iranian oil ships.

Trevor:

Well, Iran starts confiscating American oil ships, and you've got, there's a

Trevor:

lot of fight back to the idea of the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

hegemon, so.

Trevor:

it's interesting times and, and really, you know, a lot of US power or money

Trevor:

is tied up in naval power, which is extremely vulnerable, really expensive

Trevor:

missiles, which, you know, you sort of run out of quickly in terms of sort of

Trevor:

just tanks and artillery and stuff because they've been paying through the nose.

Trevor:

Overpriced for these defense contracts.

Trevor:

They haven't been getting the bang for their buck, even though they've

Trevor:

been spending so much money So the capacity to wage war isn't as great

Trevor:

as we might think it is But anyway, that is all for discussion next week

Trevor:

because an hour and a half is more than enough We'll talk to you then.

Trevor:

Bye for now.

Scott:

And it's a good night for me.

Scott:

And it's a good night for

Trevor:

him.

Trevor:

Good night

Next Episode All Episodes Previous Episode

About the Podcast

Show artwork for The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
News, political events, culture, ethics and the transformations taking place in our society.

Listen for free

One Off Tips

If you don't like Patreon, Paypal or Bitcoin then here is another donation option. The currency is US dollars.
Donate via credit card.
d
dave slatyer $200
general thanks especially tiananmen episode , plenty to reconsider and the Episode 440 - Venezuela's Election
C
Colin J Ely $10
Keep up the good work
S
Steve Shinners $20
This is for In the Eye of the Storm. Better than shouting beer anyway 😊